Testing Reports contact us

Birds Eye Wall's (Unilever)
Unilever testing report 14-01-99.doc

Table of Contents

Item 1. Danfoss VSD *

SECTION I – Item Details *

SECTION II - Schedule of Attachments *

SECTION III - Acceptance Signatories *

Attachments – 1) Flow Chart *

Attachments – 3) Test Results *

Code Sample Summary *

IC List *

Automatic Validation Results *

Overall Conclusion *

Analysis Report *

Item 2. Siemens PLC *

SECTION I – Item Details *

SECTION II - Schedule of Attachments *

SECTION III - Acceptance Signatories *

Attachments – 1) Flow Chart *

Attachments – 3) Test Results *

Code Sample Summary *

IC List *

Automatic Validation Results *

Overall Conclusion *

Analysis Report *

Item 3. Symax PLC *

SECTION I – Item Details *

SECTION II - Schedule of Attachments *

SECTION III - Acceptance Signatories *

Attachments – 1) Flow Chart *

Attachments – 3) Test Results *

Code Sample Summary *

IC List *

Automatic Validation Results *

Overall Conclusion *

Analysis Report *

 

This report does not provide a warranty or guarantee concerning the compliance status of the equipment checked in the submitted tests. The code samples used as a basis for analysis are representative of the code executed by the system in normal operation, but may not encompass each and every time-related function present in the tested systems. The analysis represents an opinion based on the code samples and information collected, and is intended for use as input into a risk management process.

 

Item 1. Danfoss VSD

SECTION I – Item Details

Manufacturer:

Danfoss

Model:

VLT 3000

Asset Tag:

DT_Item_1

SECTION II - Schedule of Attachments

No.

Description

Reference/Version

1)

Flow Charts

Included

2)

Manufacturer’s Statement

Held by client

3)

Test Results

Included

4)

Tracking

Held by client

SECTION III - Acceptance Signatories

The following signatories confirm :

* EITHER that they have read and accept the statements concerning millennium compliance (as defined by document "Millennium Compliance Definition") detailed in the Schedule of Attachments and that no further works are required.

* OR that the system is obsolete and that no further works are required.

* Delete as applicable.

1) Project Manager

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

 

Date:

/ /

2) Working Team Representative

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

    

Date:

/ /

3) Client Programme Manager

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

    

Date:

/ /

 

Attachments – 1) Flow Chart

Figure System Testing Process Flowchart

Attachments – 3) Test Results

Code Sample Summary

Probe User: WSP Business Technology User

Project: Bird’s Eye Walls

Site Reference: Gloucester

Domain: Engineering

Asset Number: DT_Item_1

Equipment Category: Electrical Motor Drive

Equipment Make: Danfoss

Equipment Model: VLT 3000

Firmware Version: 175H2601.175C0937

Serial Number: not recorded

IC List

CPU (u20) 68008

RAM (u8) 6116

Automatic Validation Results

Overall Conclusion

[ ] Inconclusive based on sampled information provided

[X] No detected evidence of RTC or date in memory

[ ] No detected evidence of date comparison in any code sample

[ ] Detected evidence of date comparison, correct implementation

[ ] Detected evidence of date comparison, incorrect implementation

Analysis Report

Analysis of the contents of system memory showed activity in a number of areas. Detailed examination of this activity showed that the system is maintaining no elapsed seconds counters or date/time structures in memory.

It is therefore totally unlikely that the system can or will suffer any sort of date-related failure.

 

Item 2. Siemens PLC

SECTION I – Item Details

Manufacturer:

Siemens

Model:

Siematic 6ES5

Asset Tag:

DT_Item_2

SECTION II - Schedule of Attachments

No.

Description

Reference/Version

1)

Flow Charts

Included.

2)

Manufacturer’s Statement

Held by client

3)

Test Results

Included

4)

Tracking

Held by client

SECTION III - Acceptance Signatories

The following signatories confirm :

* EITHER that they have read and accept the statements concerning millennium compliance (as defined by document "Millennium Compliance Definition") detailed in the Schedule of Attachments and that no further works are required.

* OR that the system is obsolete and that no further works are required.

* Delete as applicable.

1) Project Manager

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

 

Date:

/ /

2) Working Team Representative

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

    

Date:

/ /

3) Client Programme Manager

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

    

Date:

/ /

 

Attachments – 1) Flow Chart

Figure System Testing Process Flowchart

Attachments – 3) Test Results

Code Sample Summary

Probe User: WSP Business Technology User

Project: Bird’s Eye Walls

Site Reference: Gloucester

Domain: Engineering

Asset Number: DT_Item_2

Equipment Category: Process Control

Equipment Make: Siemens

Equipment Model: Siematic 6ES5

Firmware Version: BSCP523.810109405

Serial Number: not recorded

IC List

CPU 8032

ROM NM27512

RAM1 84256

RAM2 84256

RTC DP8570

Automatic Validation Results

Overall Conclusion

[ ] Inconclusive based on sampled information provided

[X] No detected evidence of RTC or date in memory

[ ] No detected evidence of date comparison in any code sample

[ ] Detected evidence of date comparison, correct implementation

[ ] Detected evidence of date comparison, incorrect implementation

Analysis Report

The RTC chip on the Siemens CPU card was not accessed by the applications software.

Analysis of the contents of system memory showed activity in only one RAM chip, at very few locations. . Detailed examination of this activity showed that the system is maintaining no elapsed seconds counters or date/time structures in memory.

It is therefore totally unlikely that the system can or will suffer any sort of date-related failure.

Item 3. Symax PLC

SECTION I – Item Details

Manufacturer:

Symax

Model:

50

Asset Tag:

DT_Item_3

SECTION II - Schedule of Attachments

No.

Description

Reference/Version

1)

Flow Charts

Included.

2)

Manufacturer’s Statement

Held by client

3)

Test Results

Included

4)

Tracking

Held by client

SECTION III - Acceptance Signatories

The following signatories confirm :

* EITHER that they have read and accept the statements concerning millennium compliance (as defined by document "Millennium Compliance Definition") detailed in the Schedule of Attachments and that no further works are required.

* OR that the system is obsolete and that no further works are required.

* Delete as applicable.

1) Project Manager

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

 

Date:

/ /

2) Working Team Representative

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

    

Date:

/ /

3) Client Programme Manager

Name:

    

Position:

  

Signature:

    

Date:

/ /

 

Attachments – 1) Flow Chart

Figure System Testing Process Flowchart

Attachments – 3) Test Results

Code Sample Summary

Probe User: WSP Business Technology User

Project: Bird’s Eye Walls

Site Reference: Gloucester

Domain: Engineering

Asset Number: DT_Item_1

Equipment Category: Process Control

Equipment Make: Symax

Equipment Model: 50

Firmware Version: M50.105.782

Serial Number: 1681

IC List

CPU 8031

RAM 55256

ROM 27512

Automatic Validation Results

Overall Conclusion

[ ] Inconclusive based on sampled information provided

[X] No detected evidence of RTC or date in memory

[ ] No detected evidence of date comparison in any code sample

[ ] Detected evidence of date comparison, correct implementation

[ ] Detected evidence of date comparison, incorrect implementation

Analysis Report

Analysis of the contents of system memory showed a high rate of activity in the RAM chip, at many different locations. Detailed examination of this activity showed that the system is maintaining a two-byte elapsed tenths-of-seconds counter, but no date/time structures in memory. The counter will wrap around every 1.8 hours, so cannot be used for date or time of day functions.

It is therefore totally unlikely that the system can or will suffer any sort of date-related failure.